Documentation/Modules/Engineering guide to pin and clevis joint design

Engineering guide to pin and clevis joint design

Analyze pins, clevis joints, and shear connections for single and double shear failure modes with bearing capacity and safety factors for linkage and lug design.

Standards catalog

Validation: indicative · Method band: formula

Open calculator

Indicative method: Double/single shear and clevis bearing stress screening

Assumptions

  • Linear elastic material behavior unless noted otherwise.
  • User is responsible for load combinations and load factors per the selected design code.
  • Design standard (US/EU/ISO) sets unit defaults and screening check labels — not a full code worksheet.

Limitations

  • Does not include fatigue spectra or full pin-hole fretting analysis.
  • Professional screening — verify critical pins against ANSI/ISO hardware standards.

Engineering checks

CheckINDUSEUISO
Pin shear safetyimplemented
Pin bearing safetyimplemented

How engineers design pin connections

Pins are cylindrical fasteners loaded primarily in shear, connecting linkages, clevises, hinges, and lifting lugs. Unlike bolts, pins are not preloaded — they carry direct transverse load through shear across one or two planes. The analysis checks pin shear stress and plate bearing stress, then reports the governing mode and overall safety factor. Pin connections are found throughout mechanical linkages, hydraulic cylinder mounts, and structural connections.

Joint types and configurations

ConfigurationShear planesDescription
Single shear1Pin between two plates, one failure plane
Double shear (clevis)2Fork-and-tongue, two failure planes
Knuckle joint2Symmetrical fork and eye
Lifting lug1 or 2Pad eye or shackle connection

Engineering workflow

  1. Determine the applied load and load direction.
  2. Select pin diameter from standard sizes or stress requirements.
  3. Identify single or double shear configuration.
  4. Calculate pin shear stress on the relevant number of shear planes.
  5. Calculate bearing stress on each plate in contact with the pin.
  6. Compare both stresses to material allowables.
  7. Report the governing failure mode and safety factor.
  8. If pin bending is significant (wide gap between clevis ears), add bending stress.

Key quantities and formulas

Pin shear stress:

Bearing stress on plate:

Overall safety factor:

Worked example

A clevis joint (double shear) carries 25 kN with a 20 mm pin. Fork plates: 12 mm each, tongue plate: 15 mm. Pin shear allowable 150 MPa, plate bearing allowable 300 MPa.

  • Pin area: mm.
  • Shear stress: MPa. SF(shear) = 3.77.
  • Bearing on tongue (thinnest): MPa. SF(bearing) = 3.60.
  • Governing mode: bearing on tongue plate. Overall SF = 3.60.

Common mistakes and checks

  • Neglecting pin bending: if the gap between clevis ears is larger than the pin diameter, bending stress can exceed shear stress.
  • Using tensile area instead of shank area: pins are not threaded — use the full cross-sectional area.
  • Forgetting to check both plates: bearing stress must be checked on the thinnest plate, not just the thickest.
  • Ignoring edge distance: insufficient material between hole edge and plate boundary causes tear-out.

FAQ

When does pin bending matter?

When the unsupported span (gap between bearing surfaces) exceeds about 1.5 times the pin diameter. In that case, treat the pin as a simply supported beam with central load.

Can hardened pins be used to increase capacity?

Yes — a hardened pin increases shear allowable but does not help if bearing on softer plates governs. Use hardened bushings in the plates for balanced design.

What is the difference between a pin and a bolt in a connection?

A bolt is preloaded axially and may carry shear through friction; a pin carries load entirely through shear and bearing with no axial clamp.

How does ASME BTH-1 apply to pin connections?

ASME BTH-1 covers below-the-hook lifting devices and specifies design factors for pin connections in lifting lugs, shackles, and rigging hardware.

Should I use a cotter pin or snap ring to retain the pin?

Either works for retention. Cotter pins are standard for field-replaceable connections; snap rings are cleaner but harder to inspect.

Use the PhyCalcPro calculator

Open the Pins & Clevis calculator to enter pin diameter, plate thicknesses, shear configuration, applied force, and material allowables. The tool returns pin shear stress, bearing stress, safety factors, and governing mode.


Purpose

Analyze pins, clevis joints, and shear connections for double or single shear failure modes including pin shear and plate bearing capacity.

Physics & theory

A pin in double shear carries load on two shear planes: . Single shear has one plane. Bearing stress on clevis plates is per plate thickness in contact. Governing capacity is the minimum of pin shear strength and plate bearing strength.

Governing equations

Numerical method

Closed-form shear and bearing screening. User selects single or double shear, pin diameter, plate thickness, and material allowables.

Inputs

ParameterDescription
Pin diameter Pin size
Plate thickness(es)Clevis ear thickness
Shear planesSingle or double
Applied force Joint load
AllowablesPin shear, plate bearing

Outputs

  • Pin shear stress, bearing stress, safety factors, governing mode.

Design codes & checks

  • Indicative: Pin shear and bearing safety factors
  • US: ASME BTH-1 pin connections (lifting context)

Assumptions & limitations

  • Pin bending neglected for standard short clevis proportions.
  • No wear or fretting on pin bore.
  • Static load; fatigue not computed.
  • Assumes aligned holes without eccentricity.

References

  1. Shigley, J. E., & Budynas, R. G. Mechanical Engineering Design, 11th ed.
  2. ASME BTH-1-2020. Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices.
  3. MIL-HDBK-5 (MMPDS) — pin and joint allowables (reference).
  4. Roark, R. J., Young, W. C., & Budynas, R. G. Formulas for Stress and Strain.

Validation & quality

Trust signals for this module — release tier, catalog status, and verification notes. Engineers should review assumptions and limitations before relying on results.

Verified
Release tier
Verified
Catalog status
indicative
Validation quality
2 / 5
Numerical depth
2 / 5 · formula
CI benchmarks
1 / 1 passed

Pin shear and bearing checks.

Fleet-wide release tiers and export audit: Quality & maturity dashboard · Trust & responsibility

Indicative results still require independent engineering review for certified work.

Related guides