Documentation/Modules/Heat Exchangers

Heat Exchangers

Estimate heat transfer and pressure drops

Standards catalog

Validation: indicative · Method band: advanced-numerics

Open calculator

Indicative method: Indicative closed-form or numerical model

Assumptions

  • Linear elastic material behavior unless noted otherwise.
  • User is responsible for load combinations and load factors per the selected design code.
  • Design standard (US/EU/ISO) sets unit defaults and screening check labels — not a full code worksheet.

Limitations

  • Professional screening / indicative workspace — does not replace a licensed PE or official code compliance review.
  • Where specialized evaluators are not implemented, checks map solver outputs to catalog templates for orientation only.

Engineering checks

CheckINDUSEUISO
Thermal duty balanceimplemented
Effectivenessimplemented

Heat Exchangers (heat-exchangers)

Purpose

Estimate thermal duty, log-mean temperature difference (LMTD), effectiveness, and pressure drop for shell-and-tube and compact heat exchanger screening using classical NTU and correlation methods.

Physics & theory

Heat transfer rate for each fluid stream. Overall conductance where LMTD depends on flow arrangement (counterflow, parallel, crossflow). Effectiveness–NTU method handles unknown outlet temperatures: as function of and capacity ratio .

Film coefficients from Dittus–Boelter (turbulent tube flow), Sieder–Tate (viscous), or user-specified values combine in . Pressure drop from Fanning friction factor correlations along tube length and fittings.

Pressure systems combine membrane stress from internal pressure with bending from weight, thermal expansion, and external loads. ASME codes distinguish sustained, occasional, and peak stress categories with different allowable limits reflecting primary vs secondary stress character.

Thin-wall theory applies when wall thickness is small compared to radius; thick-wall Lamé solutions are required for heavy-wall vessels and high-pressure cylinders.

Governing equations

Numerical method

Iterative or direct LMTD/ε–NTU solution (engine). Fluid properties at mean temperature. Pressure drop from Darcy–Weisbach with correlation friction factor. Duty balance residual reported.

Inputs

ParameterDescription
Hot/cold inlet T, flow ratesStream conditions
Fluid Properties
GeometryArea, tube ID, length, pass count
Flow arrangementCounter, parallel, cross
Fouling factorsOptional

Outputs

  • Heat duty , outlet temperatures
  • LMTD, , effectiveness, pressure drops, duty balance check.

Design codes & checks

  • Indicative: Thermal duty balance, effectiveness screening
  • TEMA: Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association standards (reference)

Assumptions & limitations

  • Steady-state, no phase change or condensation correlations unless extended.
  • Uniform heat transfer coefficients; no maldistribution.
  • Single shell-and-tube pass screening; multi-pass requires correction factors.
  • Material compatibility and vibration (TEMA) not evaluated.

References

  1. Incropera, F. P., et al. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 8th ed. Wiley.
  2. Kern, D. Q. Process Heat Transfer. McGraw-Hill.
  3. TEMA. Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association, 10th ed.
  4. Shah, R. K., & Sekulić, D. P. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. Wiley.
  5. PhyCalcPro verification benchmarks in src/data/verification/ where available for this module.
  6. Beer, F. P., et al. Mechanics of Materials, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill — foundational stress and deformation theory.
Maintainer note: Thermal correlations and iterative steps benefit from core reuse.