Documentation/Modules/Suspension & Sway

Suspension & Sway

Analyze vehicle suspension and sway dynamics

Standards catalog

Validation: indicative · Method band: advanced-numerics

Open calculator

Indicative method: Indicative closed-form or numerical model

Assumptions

  • Linear elastic material behavior unless noted otherwise.
  • User is responsible for load combinations and load factors per the selected design code.
  • Design standard (US/EU/ISO) sets unit defaults and screening check labels — not a full code worksheet.

Limitations

  • Professional screening / indicative workspace — does not replace a licensed PE or official code compliance review.
  • Where specialized evaluators are not implemented, checks map solver outputs to catalog templates for orientation only.

Engineering checks

CheckINDUSEUISO
Ride frequencyimplemented
Damping ratioimplemented

Suspension & Sway (suspension)

Purpose

Screen vehicle roll response and lateral load transfer under cornering acceleration. Computes roll angle, roll moment, and wheel load transfer for sprung-mass suspension geometry screening.

Physics & theory

Lateral acceleration on sprung mass creates inertial force at the center of gravity (CG). This force times CG height produces roll moment about the roll axis: referenced to track width and wheelbase geometry in simplified models.

Roll angle depends on roll stiffness (spring, anti-roll bar, and tire vertical rates combined). Load transfer across track: increases outer wheel load and reduces inner — affects tire grip limits.

Dynamic analysis requires careful identification of mass, stiffness, and damping distribution. Natural frequencies depend on boundary conditions — a cantilever beam has fundamentally different modes than a simply supported beam of the same dimensions.

Damping limits resonant amplification; lightly damped structures (( zeta < 0.05 )) can see transmissibility peaks exceeding 10 near resonance. Separation margin between operating excitation and natural frequency should typically exceed 15–20% for rotating machinery.

Governing equations

Numerical method

Closed-form roll and load transfer (engine). Roll angle in degrees compared to stability thresholds (≤ 2° stable, ≤ 5° moderate, > 5° high roll).

Inputs

ParameterDescription
sprungMassSprung mass
lateralAccelerationCornering (m/s²)
wheelbase, trackWidthGeometry
cgHeightCG height
rollStiffnessTotal roll rate (N·m/rad)

Outputs

  • Lateral force, roll moment, roll angle (degrees), load transfer, design status.

Design codes & checks

  • Indicative: Roll angle and load transfer screening

Assumptions & limitations

  • Steady-state cornering; no transient roll dynamics or damping.
  • Rigid body sprung mass; no compliance frequency analysis.
  • Does not compute understeer gradient or tire friction ellipse.
  • Anti-roll bar tuning requires detailed suspension model beyond this screen.

Verification

References

  1. Gillespie, T. D. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. SAE International.
  2. Milliken, W. F., & Milliken, D. L. Race Car Vehicle Dynamics. SAE.
  3. Reimpell, J., et al. The Automotive Chassis, 2nd ed. SAE.
  4. ISO 4138:2012. Passenger cars — Steady-state circular driving behaviour.
  5. Beer, F. P., et al. Mechanics of Materials, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill — foundational stress and deformation theory.
Maintainer note: Dynamic response logic with tuning and model-variant growth.