Documentation/Modules/Shaft Design

Shaft Design

Torsion, bending, fatigue analysis

Standards catalog

Validation: indicative · Method band: fem

Open calculator

Indicative method: Combined stress + Goodman fatigue + critical-speed screening (DIN 743 / AGMA oriented)

Assumptions

  • Linear elastic material behavior unless noted otherwise.
  • User is responsible for load combinations and load factors per the selected design code.
  • Design standard (US/EU/ISO) sets unit defaults and screening check labels — not a full code worksheet.

Limitations

  • DIN 743 / AGMA fatigue factors are partial — notch catalogs and full multi-station worksheets not complete.
  • Professional screening — verify critical shafts with specialized shaft software before release.

Engineering checks

CheckINDUSEUISO
Combined stress utilizationimplemented
Shaft deflectionimplemented
Critical speed marginimplemented
Fatigue safety (Goodman)implemented

Shaft Design (shafts)

Purpose

Analyze rotating shafts under combined bending, torsion, and axial loads using 1D FEA. Supports stepped/hollow geometry, configurable bearing supports, transverse forces, stress concentrations, fatigue screening (Marin + Goodman), FEA critical speed, and bearing reaction handoff.

Physics & theory

Power-transmitting shafts experience bending from belt/gear forces, torsion from transmitted torque, and occasional axial thrust. Stress at any section combines normal and bending stress with torsional shear; von Mises equivalent stress governs static yield checks for ductile materials.

Rotating shafts subject bending to fully reversed fatigue; torsion is typically steady. Critical (whirling) speed is estimated from FEA mass and bending stiffness (first lateral modes).

Governing equations

Fatigue (Indicative/US):

Numerical method

1D shaft FEM: Hermite beam elements (12 DOF) with axial, torsion, and biaxial bending. Stepped diameter and hollow sections via segment mesh. Pin or fixed supports at user-defined bearing positions. Lumped-mass eigen iteration for critical speed.

Inputs

ParameterDescription
geometryUniform or stepped segments (length, OD, ID)
supportsBearing positions — pin (journal) or fixed
loadsTorque, bending moment, transverse force, axial force at stations
stressFeaturesShoulder fillet, keyway, or custom Kt
operatingRpmEnables fatigue and critical speed margin
materialE, G, density, yield, ultimate strength

Outputs

  • T(x), M(x), V(x), , deflection, slope, critical speed, fatigue SF
  • Bearing reactions and slope utilization
  • Governing failure mode (static / fatigue / deflection / slope / whirling)

Design codes & checks

  • Indicative: von Mises static, deflection, critical speed margin, Goodman fatigue
  • US: AGMA 6001 interface loads (context via gear handoff)
  • EU: DIN 743 full worksheet — not yet implemented; use Indicative fatigue for screening

Assumptions & limitations

  • Linear elastic Timoshenko/Euler shaft model; no 3D fillet FEA
  • Kt from Peterson/Shigley approximations, not DIN 743-2 tables
  • Critical speed: first two lateral modes; gyroscopic/damping omitted
  • DIN 743 influence factors (K₁, K₂, K₃, β, K_V) not yet integrated

Verification

Cross-module handoff

  • Publishes alternating/mean stress to fatigue module after calculate
  • Receives gear/pulley loads from upstream calculators (manual today)

References

  1. Shigley, J. E., & Budynas, R. G. Mechanical Engineering Design, 11th ed., Ch. 7.
  2. Peterson, R. E. Stress Concentration Factors.
  3. DIN 743:2012 (EU target standard — partial integration planned).
Maintainer note: Mechanics + fatigue pipeline with many derived parameters.